HUMAN LIFE IS OUR GREATEST ASSET: Rebuilding the Middle Class and our Nation
Today’s Democratic National Convention supported the false premise that one way to strengthen the middle class is by providing abortion-on-demand and abortifacients. In other words– is the babies’ fault.
Others, like the Republican Party, continue to examine the state of the middle class and programs like Social Security solely from the standpoint of the Federal government’s raiding of the system (which is absolutely true)– but they forget that programs like Social Security are also hurting because we are missing over 50 million Americans, that could have contributed to the system– had they not been murdered through abortion.
Over fifty million killed– nearly the population of England.
ABORTION IS DEATH TO THE MIDDLE CLASS– AND TO OUR ENTIRE NATION
At the heart of the international Communist goal of the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century (the infamous Agenda 21) is the depopulation of entire areas through abortion-on-demand and abortifacient programs, even in regions that are already dangerously low, in terms of population growth. This is being accomplished through the Sustainable Development initiative, which presents human beings as enemies of the environment. As such, Sustainable Development dictates that there must be less human beings– and ALL HUMAN ACTIVITIES (procreation, eating habits (particularly meat) property rights– as well as cultural and religious values must be subjected to globalist governance– and reshaped into a globalist way of life. In other words: COMMUNISM.
Sustainable Development is taught to American children in public schools (and to children all over the world). On a national and international level it is also taught at colleges and universities– and YES, even at religious universities:
Those that claim to be “conservatives” while participating and promoting Sustainable Development often justify their activities by claiming that they “are making a difference for the poor”. DON’T BELIEVE IT. Sustainable Development is BIG BUSINESS– and it involves billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars. Sustainable Development has many parts– but they all work towards the same goal: DEPOPULATION and WORLD GOVERNANCE.
The killing of innocent human life is destroying our society—not just morally, but economically as well. Unless we stop this slaughter of innocents, our nation is doomed.
Throughout the world, most especially in the United States and Europe, human life has been devalued, and anti-human ideologies have infected our communities and government. Innocent human life has become a disposable commodity.
In the economic sphere, those who promote the sanctity of life are under attack by socialists and “progressive” economists who see population growth as an enemy of the economy. Tragically, the latter’s neo-Malthusian policies and practices have become institutionalized in federal and state legislation.
Over the last 40 years, the federal government has spent billions upon billions of tax dollars to promote population control at home and abroad. These anti-baby, anti-natalist programs have included abortion by both surgical and chemical means, as well as mass sterilization.
It is time for the federal government to end its “Stop the Stork” campaign initiated by the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare in the early 1970s, and replace it with pro-family and pro-natalist policies– which served this nation well from the founding of the Republic up until the passage of anti-life legislation four decades ago.
It is the family which is the building block and foundation for a civilized society. The family existed from man’s beginning– before the creation of the State and the Church. We need to support legislation that supports the family and remove legislation which undermines and endangers the family.
We must work tirelessly, openly and publicly to promote and defend the sanctity of all human life from cradle to grave. We must fight especially hard for the most vulnerable of our citizens– especially the mentally and physically handicapped, born and unborn, and the aged and indigent. When our poor reach out for bread, they should not be given stones to eat. But a socialist environment does not help the poor. This is why it is critical that we support private sector growth– so that more jobs can be created. Americans should be able to enjoy the fruits of their own labor– without dependency on the government.
To date, more than 50 million Americans have been surgically aborted and millions more have died by chemical abortifacients and devices. Do we really want to continue this systematic destruction of our future citizens– while the push for euthanasia of the elderly and the infirmed becomes ever more aggressive?
To be for abortion, is to be against your own survival.
Please note that the above figures do not include the millions of human embryos who have been destroyed in pseudo-scientific programs involving human stem cell research and IVF programs.
What will become of our nation, if this human carnage is not stopped?
For every death sentence delivered on an unborn child by abortion, or an elderly patient by euthanasia– is a death sentence delivered upon our own nation.
I am committed to uncompromising action in defense of the sanctity of all human life– which comes to each of us as a gift from Almighty God. Human life is our greatest asset– and defending it is the best way to begin the rebuilding of the middle class and our nation.
Copyright © 2012 Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.
“ELEMENTARY, MY DEAR WATSON”– The Genie is Out of the Bottle
The Socialist Nobel Prize elite are planning their annual “Nobel Week” in Stockholm—leading up to the big prize. This year the activities will include a new event: the Nobel Week Dialogue– scheduled for December 9. The subject of this dialogue will be THE GENETIC REVOLUTION AND ITS IMPACT ON SOCIETY, aimed at providing “an opportunity for discussions that cross the traditional boundaries between science and society.”Dr. James Watson is one of the participants in this dialogue. Watson was awarded the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, for the discovery of the molecular structure of DNA. He is described as having initiated the ‘Genetic Revolution.’
Watson’s presence sets the tone for this event, given his line of thinking– as follows:
“Genetics provides the ultimate answers to the chemical underpinnings of human existence. Knowing the complete human genome, we will know what it is to be human.” — James Watson, Nobel laureate.
The first question that comes to mind is—will they invite any authentic pro-life scientists to this event?
As a pro-life woman I had the experience of fighting—very much alone– to keep a so-called “personalized medicine” genetic lab from locating to the town of Ave Maria, Florida—at the tune of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. 
The genetic lab in question (which specializes in experimenting with mice) is known as The Jackson Lab, with headquarters in Maine. The Jackson Lab is also involved in the world of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Its obscure business proposal for locating to Ave Maria was to practice “personalized medicine”— even though The Jackson Lab had no record of having engaged in such a field before.
There were people in other parts of Collier County who opposed The Jackson Lab project solely based on the taxpayer funding aspect– and the absence of a voter referendum. Other than that, they made it very clear that they did not want to become involved in “moral issues”.
While I actively supported the fight against the use of taxpayer dollars for this project—no one publicly opposed The Jackson Lab based on pro-life principles—except for me. It was a lonely and intense battle inside Ave Maria, that took more than a year of my life—but I prevailed. As such, I helped save Florida’s taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
Upon examination of the upcoming Nobel Peace Dialogue event in Stockholm, I could not help but remember all of the morally-bankrupt justifications I heard from “Catholics” inside the town of Ave Maria—who passionately supported The Jackson Lab tax-payer funded project. 
In spite of all the press coverage, in Florida there were only two people who publicly opposed The Jackson Lab project in Ave Maria, on pro-life grounds: yours truly– followed (several months later) by the Bishop of the Diocese of Venice.
The pro-life world remained silent during The Jackson Lab scandal– except for the prestigious pro-life journalist, Mrs. Randy Engel– who detailed The Jackson Lab’s long history in the dark world of Eugenics.
I am not against new scientific endeavors. I am, however, very cautious about new technologies that can be actually categorized as pseudo-science, specifically when it comes to experimenting with human beings. Such technologies have, as a point of departure, the values of the scientists that are developing them. That presents a serious problem, if said scientists are atheists or agnostics. God created us in his image—and our value and dignity cannot be measured in terms of microscopic genetic analysis, by Nobel Peace laureates.
In consideration of the above, we are presented with a multitude of serious moral questions when it comes to genetic technologies. Here are just a few:
Is it right to conquer all disease—regardless of the methods, such as the destruction of another human life?
Is it right to conquer disabilities, aging and death—regardless of the methods?
Should we make life-altering decisions based on genetic risk—even when treatment may not be available in our lifetime? In other words, diagnostic programs do not guarantee therapeutic solutions.
Fiscally speaking, the Human Genome project was a massive program (financed in the United States by the National Institutes of Health and by the Department of Energy). Are we– as taxpayers, morally obligated to provide new genetic technologies for “personalized medicine / health care”? After all, we live in a world where abortion-on-demand is also considered “health care” that taxpayers are expected to support.
No doubt that Watson may have let the “genie out of the bottle” with his ‘Genetic Revolution’—leading to the Human Genome project. In fact, it also led J. Craig Venter to create “Synthia”. Venter, who has been lauded as one of the first scientists to sequence the human genome, explained during a press conference that “Synthia” is “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet, whose parent is a computer.” 
This ‘Genetic Revolution’ will continue to besiege us with serious moral questions, not least of which is– will it take the place of God in our society? I hope not.
Copyright © 2012 Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.
- “A Blow from a Hatchet”: Eugenics and the Catholic Perspective
(by Marielena Montesino de Stuart):
- The Ave Maria-Jackson Lab Battle—and the Erosion of What it Means to be Prolife (by Marielena Montesino de Stuart):
- The Modern PROMETHEUS Redux: The Creation of “Synthia”
(by Marielena Montesino de Stuart):